It is exciting to see the Apple iPhone top the JD Power 2009 Wireless Consumer Smartphone Satisfaction Study
and beat out two formidable competitors in HTC and Research In Motion. Interestingly, RIM with its ever popular Blackberry device came second to last overall with middling ratings for such items as Design, Features and Ease of Operation.

From a business point of view it has never made much sense to me why companies would want to have to buy and support Blackberry Enterprise server software to connect their corporate Blackberry’s to the company Exchange server when you could use a very nice HTC phone coupled with Microsoft Windows Mobile and have it working out of the box in an instant.

I know that Blackberry’s had more features for the Enterprise in the early days like remote wiping of lost phones but Microsoft has added similar functionality in recent times. So I give RIM that advantage, but surprisingly both RIM’s Blackberry OS and Microsoft’s Windows Mobile OS both got 3 out of 5 this year in the Operating System category. I am definitely not in love with Windows Mobile after using it for a lot of years and am shocked to see then that in  the survey RIM and MS managed only the same rating.

Which brings me back to the iPhone. Never have I purchased such a hyped up device (and I have bought a few duffers in my time) and been so pleased with it and actually found it to be better than I hoped. I waited for the 3G iPhone, not so much for the 3G but because they licensed ActiveSync from Microsoft which allows the iPhone to natively talk to Exchange servers straight out of the box.

As a business tool, the Safari browser, the infinite ways to expand the usage with the iTunes App store and the piece de resistance the email integration with Exchange means this is just a fabulous combination that is truly useful for the individual and the business.

I thoroughly recommend you consider the iPhone when you are next evaluating smart phones for your business or are looking to upgrade. I don’t think you will be disappointed.

Part 5 - Outsource IT or parts of it

Outsourcing is probably a dirty word to some, especially when it is referring to jobs being sent overseas. That is not what I am referring to here, though it is difficult to know where the employees are if you use a large corporations services. I am talking about outsourcing either components of your system or perhaps all of it, but in the case of all of it, it should be done in a considered way or it may not work for you.

Partial Outsourcing

The first type of outsourcing I want to cover from a perspective of saving money is that of outsourcing one or more components – which could be an application or service that you currently run in house but could be done better by partners, either because it is not your core competency or it simply can be done cheaper in an alternative fashion.

My favorite current example of a component of IT being outsourced is that of email and in particular Microsoft Exchange. First of all, Exchange is a fabulous product that has been one of Microsoft’s best over the long haul and I have been involved in many implementations over the years and have never had a customer unhappy with the product or delivery. However, Exchange is a complicated product that requires continuous management and maintenance performed by someone with good messaging skills – there is more to it than meets the eye.

So consider this, even in the smallest organization, say with 5 users all with mailboxes, all requiring calendaring, contacts, tasks etc, the cheapest way to have the benefits of MS Exchange is probably to buy Small Business Server and a basic piece of hardware. Now the cheapest server with SBS 2008 costs around $3000 in the box, and that doesn’t include setup, backup and restore or anything else. Once it is in and all up and running, you then have the ongoing management costs, the upgrades, the electricity, etc.

Microsoft also provides Exchange via their Online Services (as do others but I haven’t been impressed by several other offerings I have tested) and for around $40 per month you can get your 5 mailboxes, the exact same benefits but literally none of the other costs from purchasing to managing and maintaining. You could enjoy the same features using the online edition for 6 years before it will cost you more than the initial outlay for hardware and software for your own internal version. To me that makes economic sense for any small or medium business.

The decision point as to whether it is relevant to you will be the number of users you have as there is a cross over point where it may not be so viable but I believe this could be a very high number in the thousands due to the increased levels of hardware and software you need to support big installations. Also for consideration is whether you use the server for other tasks. SBS will definitely provide other benefits that make it cost effective, as the server in a small environment will be performing multiple roles. Once you have Exchange on its own server the online version works out even better. I would love to see many companies taking advantage of this and having a professional email domain name to go along with it!

Total Outsourcing

Total outsourcing or outsourcing your entire IT operation provides definite savings if managed correctly. By removing your employee costs (and maybe re-allocating them to business growth tasks) and moving to a fixed cost contract you can save a large amount of money per year. A fixed cost contract means no more payroll, no more benefit expenses, no more overtime when the servers go down at 6pm on a Friday and instead hopefully a team of people who specialize in running IT for a business as their main task. They will have the procedures and skills in place to deliver a consistent security baseline, alert you to issues before they occur and be able to present to you improvements as technology develops and becomes relevant to you.

Here are a couple of thoughts:

1. If you do outsource, consider that local outsourcing is the way to go as you need to know that the company will have people on the ground to understand your environment and service needs quickly in the event of a problem - also the IT team external or otherwise is a key function of your business and knowing who they are is critical for success.

2. Key to saving with outsourcing is ensuring your IT house is in order before committing to a relationship, otherwise your fixed cost quickly becomes very variable. By this, I mean that if your systems are not standardized and rationalized first and you just handover a mess, then you are going to endure ongoing issues that will generate additional charges on top of the standard rates. Systems should already be built to a well documented standard then the outsourcer will only have to perform to the contract rather than performing continual ongoing fix projects. It is these fix projects that generate the extra fees and all of a sudden make outsourcing less effective.

Now for the shameless plug – Squeeze Technology (www.squeezetech.com) can hook you up with either of these options if you so wish and can help you evaluate which is more beneficial to you, as always, these are multi-faceted issues.

Part 4 – Remote Working

Everyone knows that allowing your employees to work from somewhere else other than your office has many benefits.

From a business point of view first and foremost you can save on office space – perhaps reconfiguring your office to a place where people can come in to collaborate flexibly rather than sitting in cubes. The saving here is pretty easy to calculate in terms of square footage not being rented, moreover you need less furniture, less maintenance staff, less electricity, which all means less expenditure.

From an employee viewpoint, you don’t have a commute so you could save several hours per day, you can start work earlier, finish later and still be home earlier than ever!

Also as I understand, people are more productive working from home. I am not an expert in this area so I will take it that it is probably true – just the fact you cant be in relentless meetings all day is a bonus.

What Are The Basics To Getting This Running?

A lot of what you need depends on what you want your users to be able to do when they work away. In a simple scenario they may require access to documents, they will want to run some specific applications (other than standard office apps which would be installed locally) and they will require email access. Here is how you might choose to deliver this:

Documents – the two most common ways are either to provide VPN access to your corporate network which will require at least at VPN server at the office end and a client on the user side . Once the VPN is connected files can be accessed using the same drives that you use when in the office. The downside is when file structures are large or you need to move lots of files around, it can be very slow over DSL connections. The second option is to use an intranet document management store such as SharePoint which can either be exposed on the internet (so no VPN required) or kept internal (VPN required). A web system will work well when users need to upload / download documents, work on them for a while and then move on to the next. Normally version control and document management features such as check in / check out are included to save multiple users editing the same documents at the same time.

Applications – if the application is traditional client / server type and doesn’t require very much bandwidth then you might get away with running the client over a VPN so it can connect to the server. If it has heavy duty network requirements then delivering the client component via terminal services will probably be your best bet. Here you have several choices as you could connect via VPN, then connect to the server via a remote desktop, or you could put the server directly on the internet and connect to the service without using the VPN to establish a remote desktop or you could finally host the Remote Desktop client on a web site that connects into the corporate network. If the application is web based or hosted (see my next blog Part 5 for more details) then the key applications may not even be on your corporate network which makes life even easier as all the users need is most likely a web browser.

Email – Microsoft Exchange provides many ways to get at your email, but if a user is going to work heavily on email , then the best choice by far is using a full Outlook client configured with RPC over HTTPS. By using this technique you don’t need a VPN up all the time and it feels like you are sitting in the office. Alternatively you can still run it over a VPN connection if it happens to be up for other reasons. Outlook Web Access also provides a great solution, but I find that it is better for brief email spells or a quick check. It’s a great solution but I still prefer the full client. The extra benefit of using RPC over HTTPS is that once you are set up server side it is just a few seconds of effort to have your Windows Mobile or Apple iPhone connected to your corporate email too. No middleware or Enterprise servers required, it works straight out of the box, mobile data plans not withstanding.

Coming Soon. Direct Access

Now here is a really exciting development, that builds on the discussion – Direct Access technology in Windows 7.

For any one who uses Outlook with RPC over HTTPS you will now how liberating and flexible it is – wherever you are in the world as long as you have an internet connection Outlook behaves as if it is on the corporate network without you knowing any different, all over an encrypted connection and no VPN needed. With Direct Access you get the same advantages but now for the whole remote experience not just email. You can work on company systems, files, intranets, email, everything as if you are connected directly and without a need for a VPN. No clunky VPN clients, connection processes or VPN devices at the business end. Direct Access will therefore save money on network hardware.

The best bit is from a management point of view the laptop appears as if it is on the corporate network and you can apply group policies, deploy software, patches or anything else just as if the computer was in the office.

The only small downside is you need Windows Server 2008 R2 in place at the back end and of course, Windows 7 as the client. Once these two platforms are more common, you will be getting all the solutions above solved with the purchase of software you would have bought anyway.

For more information on Remote Working, please visit www.squeezetech.com or contact the author.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.